|

Cast:
Chow
Yun Fat
Seann
William Scott
Jaime
King
Karel
Roden
Victoria
Smurfit
Mako
Action:
Stephen
Tung Wai
Guy
Norris
Producer:
John
Woo
Terence
Chang
Charles
Roven
Douglas
Segal
Director:
Paul
Hunter
Score:
    
|
BULLETPROOF
MONK
AKA:
N/A
Year:
2003 Reviewer: Phil
Mills
You
know, it's extremely sad that even after all the recent
success that Asian stars have enjoyed globally, producers and
casting agents are still so blind to see beyond the
stereotyped image that all Asians are the next Bruce
Lee! 'Bulletproof Monk' is the latest in a long line of films that
seems to prove this and sees veteran actor Chow Yun Fat placed
in the over-familiar mould as a monk with extraordinary
martial arts skills.
Under
the rulings of a Tibetan religion, every 60 years a protector
is chosen for an ancient scroll that is said to gives it's
possessor the power to rule the world. The current
candidate is a mystery monk (Yun Fat) who has given up all
luxuries to fulfil his duties. However, the open spaces
of Tibet are no longer safe so he relocates to the streets of
New York in an attempt to keep the scroll out of trouble.
Along his travels, he discovers a young thief by the name of
Kar (Scott) who shows signs of potential so the monk decides
to team up with him so he can keep him under a watchful eye.
Of course, where there is an all-powerful scroll there is
normally a bad guy and this one comes in the form of a German
soldier who has spent years trying to track down the monk.
Now the question remains as to whether the scroll will stay on
the side of good or fall into the hands of pure evil?
If
you were expecting 'Bulletproof Monk' to be a modern-day
'Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon' then I suggest you look away
now as sadly, that couldn't be further from the truth.
In fact, Chow's attempt to follow up his smash hit is probably
best described as a cliché-ridden mess that is condemned by a
combination of a poor script, bad casting and laughable
action. This may sound harsh but its a fair description
of a movie that contains a concept that could have been
devised within minutes and fails to deliver in any of the
proposed elements of excitement, comedy or drama.
Coupled with this, the bizarre pairing of an acting legend and
members of the "teen comedy" genre is a total
failure and there is no sign of any chemistry or impressive
acting ability, even taking into account Yun Fat's best
efforts at delivering humourous one-liners.
The
final nail in the coffin is the action which, although
intended to be the film's saving grace, is by the far the
worst attribute and it's surprising to see it was
choreographed by Hong Kong's own Stephen Tung Wai.
Basically, it consists of an ensemble of clumsy wirework,
noticeable doubling and blatant CGI, all of which make the
assembled cast of non-martial artists look exactly like the
amateurs they are. No attempt seems to have been made to
train them and its ridiculous that they expect the audience to
believe what they are seeing as one minute the actors look as
graceful as a Rhino and the next they are flying expertly
through the air (thanks to Mr. Stuntman and Mrs. CGI).
Perhaps the most important revelation of this sorry excuse for
action though is that it does make you realise just how
experienced Yuen Woo Ping is. Whatever other criticisms
could be levelled at 'The Matrix', there is no disguising the
fact that Woo Ping did manage to make the cast (who were also
non-martial artists) look semi-competent in the work they did.
Even
by Hollywood standards this movie has to be considered a
stinker, especially when the presence of one of my most
favoured actors can't save it from leaving a bad impression.
Yun Fat's talent has been sadly misinterpreted and I just hope
that this isn't the way that his career will continue because
he clearly has so much more to offer than this stereotyped
rubbish. On a brighter note though, his next project
will see him reunited with John Woo (in a directing capacity)
so we can only hope that it will get all parties concerned
back on the right track and we can forget about 'Bulletproof...
what was it again?
|